“Random” and “Bored”: New code words for black on white hate crimes

This is what happens.

This is not an aberration.

Two innocent white men viciously murdered by young black males in the span of less than a week.

It’s outrageous, horrifying, tragic, damned infuriating, but it isn’t shocking. It should be shocking, but it isn’t.

I’ll be honest, I’m pissed off. I’m disgusted. I’m sickened to my core. I have no interest in being nice or politically correct about this. If you want that, go somewhere else. I’m too tired for that. I’m tired of the cowards. I’m tired of the liars. I’m tired of the blood thirsty race pimps who do everything in their power to stir up hatred and animosity, and then fade into the night when the poison they spread claims another life. I’m tired of the violence and the chaos, and I’m even more tired of the people who close their eyes and pretend it isn’t happening. It is happening. And, statistically, most of it is at the hands of young black males. Does that upset you? It should. But you should be upset at the PEOPLE WHO ARE DOING IT, not the people who are talking about it.

Chris Lane, the young guy here from Australia on a baseball scholarship, was randomly shot in the back and killed at around 3pm last Friday. Two teenagers, James Edwards and Chauncey Luna, are charged with his murder. A third, Michael Jones, was charged as an accessory after the fact. Edwards and Luna are black, Lane was white. Jones is also white, which was a big relief to the progressive race hustlers who are desperate to keep up the facade that black on white violence is never, ever, ever motivated by racism. These folks will have to be very selective in their reading about this case (or simply stick to liberal media outlets, who will be even more selective in their reporting of the case) because the facts quite clearly prove at least one of the black killers to be a violent bigot. Let’s look at his own words. Here are two recent Tweets from James Edwards:

April 29th: “90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.”

July 15th: “Ayeee I knocced out 5 woods since Zimmerman court!:) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit! #ayeeee.”

“Wood” is a derogatory term for white people. So, need I point out the obvious? Need I speculate as to the global eruption that would have occurred if someone unearthed Tweets from George Zimmerman with little gems like “black people are nasty” and “knocked out 5 blacks today”? Need I explain how morally corrupt and spineless we are if we refuse to call a black teen “racist,” even after he expresses deep hatred for whites and then goes out and kills one in cold blood? Need I express how unbelievably dishonest and cowardly you are — you, personally — if you perpetuate this “blacks can’t be racist, even if they maim and murder white people” bull crap?

Oh, but never mind. These kids weren’t motivated by anything but “boredom,” we were told at first. Now we find out the “bored” teens were also gang members, and this random act of boredom also happened to be an initiation rite for the Crips. But words like “boredom” and “random” seem to be trotted out pretty frequently in these situations. Keep these terms in mind; they’re apparently police code for “black on white violence.”

An 89 year old WWII veteran was beaten to death in Washington on Wednesday night. He was walking through a parking lot when two black males descended upon him and killed him with their bare hands. Police are calling the attack “random.”

The six black teens who beat an Ohio man to death last year were also “bored,” according to police.

The gang of blacks who assaulted, stripped and robbed a white tourist in Baltimore last St. Patrick’s Day were just behaving “randomly,” which is why no hate crime charges were ever filed.

The Minnesota man who was savagely attacked and beaten to the point of brain damage by a group of young black males, was also, apparently, the victim of something “random,” something probably driven by boredom.

The 13 year old who was doused with gasoline and set on fire by two blacks in Missouri last year must have been the victim of something merely random, even while the assailants made random statements like, “this is what you get, white boy.”

A white guy was walking to his car in a parking lot in Memphis when a group of blacks came out of nowhere and shot him dead. The police are calling it a “failed robbery,” yet the young man was found with his wallet and phone still in his possession. Just another random thing, I guess.

I don’t know if the three black teenagers who brutalized a white child on a school bus in Florida two weeks ago were bored, but the father of one of the assailants told a reporter that, although his son is “sorry,” this is “just the way it is.”

It’s just the way it is.

They were bored.

It was random.

No conclusions can be drawn from any of this, right?

Sorry, wrong. A gang of black kids go after a white guy and we’re supposed to believe that the victim’s whiteness didn’t factor into the equation at all? An elderly white man is brutalized and left for dead by a couple of black men and we’re being asked to believe that such vicious hate and violence was visited upon him merely by chance? A black kid brags about knocking out white people, then goes out and shoots a white man in the back, and we’re expected to believe that he wasn’t targeted for being a member of the exact race that the murderer just publicly admitted to targeting for violence? And yet a half-white guy shoots a black teen who tackled and pummeled him, and THAT was entirely motivated by racism? Oprah makes up a story about poor customer service at a swanky purse shop in Switzerland and the media runs with the “racism” headline without hesitation, meanwhile a black guy can post online that he “hates white people” right before killing a white person, and the “R” Word is never mentioned?

Lord help us. We have descended into unadulterated lunacy.

I started this by saying that the killing of Chris Lane and the murder of the WWII veteran aren’t shocking. I’m not trying to diminish or dismiss the significance of these crimes at all. As I stated, I am horrified, sickened, saddened, enraged. But it isn’t shocking because it is also the clear result of particular and obvious factors — most directly, the actions of three despicable individuals. Yet look only a little deeper and you’ll see that those individuals were influenced by three essential ingredients: 1) A complete lack of parental guidance. 2) The evil and destructive “gangsta” culture perpetuated by rappers and other so-called “leaders” in the black community. 3) Hatred and racial animosity planted into the public conscience by certain very bad and very influential men and women.

70 percent of black fathers abandon their kids. The music industry stylizes and glorifies thuggishness and gangsterism. The President of the United States tells blacks that they are the victims of white oppression. Violence and turmoil are not side effects of these things, they are a logical result. Some people are clamoring for Obama to speak about the Chris Lane murder. Don’t hold your breath, folks; I suspect Obama finds Mr. Lane about as worthy of comment as the infants slaughtered by Kermit Gosnell.

But, personally, I don’t want to hear anything out of that man’s mouth, unless it’s an apology to the Lane family for his reckless and sinister exploitation of racial tensions.

That’s not going to happen, I know. Just as no amount of blood and death will convince many Americans to have a real conversation about the cultural factors that precipitate all of this. Instead, bodies will be buried and more lives destroyed, and the Powers that Be will remain silent, until they find a tragedy they can make something out of. Meanwhile, Chris Lane’s family and friends will mourn in silence, and the old man who fought for this country in WWII will be put in the ground, and Oprah will tell us more tales of the oppression she encounters in high end fashion stores. And nothing will change until we have the guts to be honest with each other.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

545 Responses to “Random” and “Bored”: New code words for black on white hate crimes

  1. Sam says:

    I look forward to Matt’s next blogs about the uncalled for and inappropriate reactions to the new Miss America and his bitter and timely condemnation of the murder of a unarmed college footballer by a police officer. I know the officer has been charged (and I am sure Al Sharpton was responsible for the poor officer’s arrest and charges) but just to be able to read Matt’s eloquent and praise-worthy critique of the behavior of savage policemen killing innocent civilians would really soothe my soul. It would also go a long way in showing that Matt is not the bigoted, neoracist, polemicist shrill he appears to be and is truly concerned about justice for everyone.

    • Josh says:

      How much is Media Matters paying you, Sam?

      See, I’ll try to use small words so you’ll understand them, but the face is, Matt’s entire point is that stories like the ones you mentioned are few and far between but get flogged to death by the so-called “mainstream” media, but the far more prevalent racist attacks from blacks on whites are never or rarely mentioned and the media does their best to bury stories like this and make them go away by using words like “random”, and, when they can get away with it, never mentioning the race of the attackers.

      Oops, some of my words had more than one syllable, so I doubt it penetrated your thick skull.

      Oh, and whatever Media Matters is paying you, it’s too much, because you suck at trolling.

      • mikhal skuli says:

        Don’t say no one pays attention to anything but white. on black killings when no one here even mentions the killing of 2 blacks and wounding of 3 others about a year ago in a purely racial shooting in tulsa. Yours and the bloggers focus on black on white crime is purely agenda driven.

      • mikhal skuli says:

        LOTS of white on black crime. Yours and the bloggers focus on black on white crime is purely agenda driven.

      • Josh says:

        Mikhal Skuli is a paid troll, but I’ll respond to his entirely wrong comment nonetheless.

        First, I have never said there is no white-on-black crime, but to suggest that there is “LOTS” of it is spurious and entirely untrue. 90% of the crimes against blacks are committed by other blacks, not whites, but that is not Matt’s central point, which, like the troll you are, you obscure.

        Matt was not suggesting that there is no such thing as white on black crime, and he is not here to join the media in screaming about “injustice”. This is a comparison case. How does the media treat racially motivated murder?

        Matt is saying that the media makes a huge deal out of anything that could even be perceived as a racially motivated killing…but ONLY when the victim was black and the assailant white. The above examples are clearly racially motivated, but the media won’t call it that because they refuse to admit that any black person killing a white person could possibly be racially motivated.

        I would suggest that Matt’s point is so clear that only a complete moron could miss it, but I don’t think you missed the point. I think you’re trying to obscure the point. You come on here blathering about how “no one here” is talking about the Tulsa shooting, but Matt’s entire point is that the Tulsa shooting (and others like it) got lots of media coverage because the media loves anything they can use to create a “white racism” story. The entire point of this column, which you MMfA trolls will not slag, is that they refuse to touch stories of black racist hate crimes, or make them into just random shootings with no racial motivation, even when the racial motivation is clear.

        Hey, David Brock, this one’s a bit better at trolling, but he still sucks, as all of your paid trolls do.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          The FACTS that puts the lie to the bloggers claim is that in his prime example of racial motivated killings (Lane) the shooters were on their way to kill a black youth when arrested and specifically said the shooting was not racially motivated. Of course, his claims can be made correct if you believe (as many here seem to) that blacks just lie about everything. And then there’s the white on black racially motivated shooting in Tulsa just a year before that he completely ignores.

        • Dear Numb-skuli:

          Please make a 30-minute tape of everything you know, or as close to 30 minutes as you can. I can use it on nights I can’t get to sleep. You are one unimaginative, uninspiring, uninformed, boring dude.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Personal insults do not alter FACTS.

      • Sam says:

        “See, I’ll try to use small words so you’ll understand them, but the face is, Matt’s entire point is that stories like the ones you mentioned are few and far between but get flogged to death by the so-called “mainstream” media, but the far more prevalent racist attacks from blacks on whites are never or rarely mentioned and the media does their best to bury stories like this and make them go away by using words like “random”, and, when they can get away with it, never mentioning the race of the attackers.”
        Matt’s point (if he had one) was marred by hypocrisy and bigotry. Matt (and you it seems) are more content to focus on some made up assumption that not only are Blacks killing whites with alarming impunity…the media is turning a blind eye (possibly because they fear the mighty King Al Sharpton) and that is factually not the case. When Blacks do kill whites they are statistically found guilty more often and given higher sentences. More Matt’s “point” to be truly effective (and credible) white people would have to NEVER have killed a person of color and anyone who is interested in factual evidence knows that is not the case. The wonderful thing about is that white people seem pretty gleeful and open about sharing why they killed and in most of those instances it is driven by race. The point is missed that these young people admitted why they did it. As I said earlier: if you, Matt, or anyone else here has transcripts that say it was in fact a racially motivated murder and the orders from on high say to call it “random” because Al is putting pressure on us, where involved in the investigation and have evidence that highlights something different than what the media reports, or anything that proves your claims…present it. Show us how your beliefs trump an official police report. Display how police investigations and interviews are ill equipped in the face of your social and internal acumen on the case. Tell us about the trail you would have and what evidence you would use to prove without a doubt that “random” is a cop out and it was in fact cold blooded racial murder. Ironically for all these people who “know for sure” to the point of blogging, so far no one has done/said/presented anything that leaves no doubt that Matt’s opinion is valid and truth…no one got away with anything…these criminals will be tried, convicted, and go to jail.

        Insults are always a joy to read…it highlights the fact that you (and others) have nothing constructive to add other than bigoted opinions that can easily be dismantled…but keep at it. It really did work for you guys in 2012 and I look forward to the successes insults give you in 2016!!

      • Josh says:

        “Matt (and you it seems) are more content to focus on some made up assumption that not only are Blacks killing whites with alarming impunity…the media is turning a blind eye (possibly because they fear the mighty King Al Sharpton) and that is factually not the
        case.”
        Matt provided plenty of examples that shows that is indeed the case. You are either blind to reality or a liar. I’m betting on the latter.

        “When Blacks do kill whites they are statistically found guilty more often and given higher sentences.”
        I’ve heard this old, tired canard before. What’s actually true is that far, far more murders are committed by blacks. This is not a racist statement, it is simply fact. It is not that they are given “higher” sentences, it is that they are sentenced more often because they commit more crime.

        “More Matt’s “point” to be truly effective (and credible) white people would have to NEVER have killed a person of color and anyone who is interested in factual evidence knows that is not the case.”
        No one is arguing that white have never killed people of color, just that the balance is far heavier on the black-on-white crime than white-on-black.

        “The wonderful thing about is that white people seem pretty gleeful and open about sharing why they killed and in most of those instances it is driven by race.”
        This is a spurious and untrue statement. Congratulations, you have outed yourself as a paid MMfA troll.

        “The point is missed that these young people admitted why they did it.”
        You can’t honestly believe they were just “bored”. They had just tweeted open racism. Oh, wait, I forgot, racism is only applicable to whites. A white person gets nervous around a young black man in a hoodie and it’s racism. A black man tweets how much he hates whites and enjoys beating them down for being white, and that’s nothing to worry about. No racism there. God, but you lefties are idiots.

        “As I said earlier: if you, Matt, or anyone else here has transcripts that say it was in fact a racially motivated murder and the orders from on high say to call it “random” because Al is putting pressure on us, where involved in the investigation and have evidence that highlights something different than what the media reports, or anything that proves your claims…present it. Show us how your beliefs trump an official police report. Display how police investigations and interviews are ill equipped in the face of your social and internal acumen on the case.”
        Listen, before Trayvon Martin’s body was cold, the media injected race into the story. We have been repeatedly asked to believe that Zimmerman murdered Martin because he was black, when OVERWHELMING evidence points to the fact that Martin was indeed acting suspiciously and that Zimmerman did NOT fire his gun until it was clear his life was in danger. Here, however, when there is actual, provable open racism (“90% of all white people are nasty #HATETHEM), and the media refuses to even entertain the idea that race may have motivated the killings…really, are you serious? You are either the stupidest person alive or you hope that we are. On the same day as that hateful, racist tweet, this same kid kills a white person he didn’t even know, and you seriously think I need “transcripts” or whatever to prove racial intent? Are you even human?

        “Tell us about the trail you would have and what evidence you would use to prove without a doubt that “random” is a cop out and it was in fact cold blooded racial murder. Ironically for all these people who “know for sure” to the point of blogging, so far no one has done/said/presented anything that leaves no doubt that Matt’s opinion is valid and truth…no one got away with anything…these criminals will be tried, convicted, and go to jail.”
        They will be tried, convicted and go to jail because they are guilty, and admitted as much. They were not defending their lives. They shot a white man because they hate white people and admitted that they had no motivation. That is why they will go to jail, and why George Zimmerman did not.

        “Insults are always a joy to read…”
        Thank you. You deserve all of them and more.

        “…it highlights the fact that you (and others) have nothing constructive to add other than bigoted opinions that can easily be dismantled…but keep at it. It really did work for you guys in 2012 and I look forward to the successes insults give you in 2016!!”
        Ah, the old “I won” idea. A sure sign that you are full of crap, and you know it. Also, a frequent cry of MMfA paid trolls, which you certainly are. Listen, I don’t care that you won 2012, and I don’t care if you win 2016. Winning doesn’t make you right. Your head is buried so far up your ass that you can’t see the light anymore, and I quite frankly have no more to say to you. I already know how you’re going to respond. You’re going to quote more false statistics, leftist (and lying) takes on these stories, demand I “prove” a negative, and then proclaim you’ve won when you’ve changed no minds and only proven yourself to be deluded beyond all reason.

        Have a good life. Or not.

      • Sam says:

        “Matt provided plenty of examples that shows that is indeed the case. You are either blind to reality or a liar. I’m betting on the latter.”
        So Matt, who possesses a savant like ability to assess the motives of criminals without the need to investigate, see the crime scene, or anything else needed to solve a case, turned his back on what could have been a stellar and beneficial calling as a law enforcement official…to blog. The world is truly poorer for that decision.
        “I’ve heard this old, tired canard before. What’s actually true is that far, far more murders are committed by blacks. This is not a racist statement, it is simply fact. It is not that they are given “higher” sentences, it is that they are sentenced more often because they commit more crime.”
        Actually it is truer that more Blacks kill more Blacks…just like more whites kill more whites. It is also factual that Blacks DO receive higher sentences for the same crimes than whites, be it drug related, murder or otherwise. Whites actually commit more crimes…it’s just harder to convict someone when they have the money to hire good lawyers, are pillars of the community, or have other advantages. Basically it’s easier to clear out drug dealers in the poorer communities than it is in the richer ones. Blacks don’t commit more crimes…it’s just easier to convict them.
        “ No one is arguing that white have never killed people of color, just that the balance is far heavier on the black-on-white crime than white-on-black.”
        Matt’s blog has no leg to stand on then. It reeks of hypocrisy to blast one and then ignore the other. IF Matt truly wanted to “help” there would have been a blog on other events and not just this one. The balance is not the issue….if you condemn one but are silent on the other than you are a hypocrite.
        This is a spurious and untrue statement. Congratulations, you have outed yourself as a paid MMfA troll.
        White people seem quite gleeful about sharing their feelings. When the media reports/interviews a friend or person who knew the killer there seems to be no filtering of the point the Jim Bob didn’t think to highly of his victims.
        “You can’t honestly believe they were just “bored”. They had just tweeted open racism.”
        Racism is more than calling people “mean things.” They said they were bored…the investigation came to the same conclusion. They were caught on their way to murder a Black person. As I said before if you have proof that it was racially motivated that shows the cops and media were wrong…share it. Right now it just sounds like opinion.
        “Oh, wait, I forgot, racism is only applicable to whites. A white person gets nervous around a young black man in a hoodie and it’s racism. A black man tweets how much he hates whites and enjoys beating them down for being white, and that’s nothing to worry about. No racism there. God, but you lefties are idiots.”
        If it is implausible that Lane was murdered because the teens were bored than it should be equally implausible that Zimmerman was “scared for his life” and had no choice but to kill Martin. I am fairly confident you gleefully tweeted/facebooked that verdict and told anyone who felt different that the verdict stands as truth and is final. So if that verdict was valid why is this one suspect?
        “We have been repeatedly asked to believe that Zimmerman murdered Martin because he was black,”
        Actually we have been asked to believe that Martin was a “thug” and was meandering through the neighborhood appearing to be up to no good and when he was asked by a guy just trying to do his job he flipped out and attacked
        “OVERWHELMING evidence points to the fact that Martin was indeed acting suspiciously and that Zimmerman did NOT fire his gun until it was clear his life was in danger.”
        Overwhelming evidence shows that: Zimmerman was told to cease his pursuit but he disregarded the suggestion, Zimmerman stated Martin jumped out of a bush to attack him…when there were clearly no bushes big enough to hide behind, Zimmerman was “scared” but this did not stop him from getting out of his truck, walking around, and looking for Trayvon, Zimmerman stated his reason for getting out of the truck was to tell the dispatcher that name of a street he did not know…despite there only being three streets and as a night watchman he would should know them by heart, a grown man was somehow baited into a fight with a 17 year old and felt he had no choice but to fatally shoot him, Zimmerman did not perform CPR, appear impacted in any way by the events, and explained the events in “cop jargon” to show the cops he was one of them.
        Apparently, “acting suspiciously” to some people means walking with a hood on in the rain at 7 something in the evening.
        If the Lane case/verdict is suspect…why is the Zimmerman case/verdict (which has FAR more holes) considered ironclad?
        “Here, however, when there is actual, provable open racism (“90% of all white people are nasty #HATETHEM), and the media refuses to even entertain the idea that race may have motivated the killings…really, are you serious?”
        Because it wasn’t…they were on their way to kill a Black person. Again if YOU have some damning proof that erases any doubt…please share it. If you’ve done your own investigation, interviewed witnesses and people who knew the teens, if you have transcripts where the teens say they were trying to kick off the revolution let’s see them. If you have recorded telephone conversations where Al Sharpton made the media report this and call it “just a random shooting or else” give us a link to the MP3 so we can all hear it. If you have a tell all interview with the suspects where you skills as an investigative reporter wore them down and they tearfully admitted their hatred for whites and their plan to kill them all…let’s see it. Right now you, Matt, and anyone else who buys into this drivel are nothing but bigoted, hypocritical, opinionated polemicists. To hold opinion up as fact and defend it is tragic.
        “You are either the stupidest person alive or you hope that we are. On the same day as that hateful, racist tweet, this same kid kills a white person he didn’t even know, and you seriously think I need “transcripts” or whatever to prove racial intent? Are you even human?”
        You do if you are going to go on record as some sort of authority and present yourself as a credible source for what is going on in the world.

      • Josh says:

        You’re reeeally hung up on this Tulsa shooting, aren’t you, Numb-skuli? I wonder why. Could it be that it’s one of the few confirmed cases of white-on-black shootings to occur in the recent past other than the most obvious one? Wonder why that is?

        Again, you obscure the subject. Matt’s post was not here to address racial crime in general. He is not suggesting that there is no white-on-black crime, as you seem to think he was. He did not address the Tulsa shooting because it had nothing to do with his point. The point was, very obviously, that the media loves to blow up any white-on-black crime story it can get its hands on and inject race into it well before the facts are known (and it cannot be denied that they do that very thing) while conversely, when they are forced to report on a black-on-white crime (which they’d rather, and usually do, ignore) they do their best to downplay any racial motive, even when there is a glaringly obvious one.

        The media blew up the Tulsa shooting, too. We just didn’t hear about it for as long as the other (obvious) one because the killer was immediately arrested and his guilt was clear, so the media couldn’t pretend that white people aren’t arrested or sentenced when they kill black people.

        And it’s curious that it’s this case that you seem to harp on, as you state baldly that the Tulsa shootings were racially motivated, yet deny that the shooting of Chris Lane was.

        Hmmm….

        Let’s see; In the Tulsa shooting, the shooters were white and the victims black. The shooting took place in a predominantly black neighborhood, so at first glance, the mere fact that the victims were black should not have been surprising. Jake England denied that race was a factor and his family backed him up. Later, it was discovered that after his father was shot and killed by a black man, England posted racist remarks about his father’s killer on Facebook. So, again, just to be clear, England and Watts denied that race was a factor in the shooting, which in fact took place in a black neighborhood, and the racism from him was almost a year old at that point. Not to mention his fiance had killed herself recently and they had a young son together, which obviously set his emotional state out of balance. But clearly, you believe race was the primary motivator.

        However, in the case of James Edwards and Chauncy Luna shooting Chris Lane, we have a series of racist (90% of white people are nasty #HATETHEM; I mean, it doesn’t come any more racist than that) tweets made by at least one of the shooters on the SAME DAY that they killed Lane. Edwards and Luna admitted that Lane hadn’t done anything to them, and he certainly hadn’t shot either of their fathers, but for some reason, we’re just supposed to accept that they shot him because they were “bored” and the first “random” person they decided to shoot happened to be white. It has nothing to do with your ridiculous claim that Matt and others who agree with him assume that black people “lie all the time”. But reverse the situation; Jake England posted the n-word about his father’s killer nearly a year before he shot anyone, yet no one would question his racial motivations. He claimed there was no racial motivation. But that’s not good enough. Because you assume he’s lying.

        I’m pretty sure Jake England was racially motivated, or at least by a misplaced revenge, but by your own logic, we must proclaim the killing not to be racially motivated because the killer denied it. Tweets and Facebook posts be damned.

        Doesn’t it suck when people turn your own “logic” back on you?

        But, I have little doubt you’ll just come back here, obscuring the issue again, claiming to have “facts” when you wouldn’t know a fact if it bit you in the nads, and continuing to flog the idea that because Matt didn’t mention the Tulsa shootings that somehow makes him a racist. In the meantime, I understand your boss David Brock is waiting in the break room for a blow job. Run along and do your duty, little troll. I’m done with you.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          I’m not as hung up on the Tulsa shoring as all of the here are on the Lane shooting. And, again, the FACTS are against you in your long rant. The Tulsa shooters were not on their way to kill a white person. EVERY bit of evidence is that they targeted blacks for a specific reason. There is nothing but a couple of random comments to show that occurred in the Lane shooting. And those aren’t even about Lane or that shooting.

      • Josh says:

        Oh, and to address the claim that they couldn’t have been racially motivated because they were on their way to kill a black person…I don’t care if they were on their way to jerk each other off. We know they hated white people, and we know they tweeted about it on the day they killed one. That invalidates your arguments entirely.

        Oh, and by the way, it’s perfectly obvious to me that Sam and Numb-skuli are either the same person, or their desks at MMfA headquarters are right next to each other, and they’re tag-teaming. They use the same tired, provably wrong talking points and both are obscuring the point in entirely the same manner.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          The fact that you self admittedly don’t care about actual FACTS proves that your agenda is to demonize blacks, not to deal with the FACTS of these killings. btw- personal insults will not alter those FACTS.

      • Josh says:

        AHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

        Numb-skuli is so funny. He accuses ME of not caring about actual facts. Boy, is that not liberal projection at its finest!

        “Herp derp I don’t like this fact so it’s not a fact. I don’t like that this fact doesn’t support my claim so I’ll ignore it. Herp derp now I’ll accuse a person who disagrees with me of doing the same thing I’m doing! Herp derp being a liberal douche is fun!”

        What a deluded moron. And once again he ignores his own flawed “logic”. Like it matters what Chris Lane’s murderers were on their way to do. The facts (by which I mean things that are true, not “FACTS”, which apparently are idiotic ideas from Numb-skuli’s head) show that James and Luna were anti-white scumbags. So they kill their own kind as well. That just makes them anti-white scumbags who occasionally shoot other blacks.

        Yeah, my agenda sure is demonizing blacks. Never heard that completely original accusation before. Hey, you know what a racist is? It’s a conservative winning an argument with a liberal. So, thanks, Numb-skuli, at least you let me know I won this argument.

        Did David Brock enjoy the blow-job you gave him?

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Personal insults do not alter actual FACTS. And the FACTS are that Lane’s killers were equal opportunity, on their way to kill a black youth when they shot Lane. Unlike the Tulsa killers, who specifically targeted blacks.

      • Sam says:

        “Like it matters what Chris Lane’s murderers were on their way to do. The facts (by which I mean things that are true, not “FACTS”, which apparently are idiotic ideas from Numb-skuli’s head) show that James and Luna were anti-white scumbags. So they kill their own kind as well. That just makes them anti-white scumbags who occasionally shoot other blacks.
        No it makes them exactly what they admitted and police concluded they were….depraved individuals who did not care who died. The facts stand up and support that. For your opinion (and that is all what you say is) to be “factual” you have to ignore admitted facts and insert biased opinions to give “validity” to what you are saying. Either they are anti-white killers (which would mean they would seek to kill only whites, admit it, and evidence would support this) or (as facts support) their killing were random and Lane was sadly in the wrong place at the wrong time.
        “Yeah, my agenda sure is demonizing blacks. Never heard that completely original accusation before.”
        Based on what you have said that doesn’t shock me…and instead of looking inwards at where you are stepping out of line you hurl insults and sexual barbs at people. That really “helps” your case.
        “Hey, you know what a racist is? It’s a conservative winning an argument with a liberal. So, thanks, Numb-skuli, at least you let me know I won this argument.”
        You haven’t won anything…you haven’t even shown proof that what you are claiming is valid. You haven’t presented anything that says we should believe that your (and Matt’s) platform takes greater credence that official police investigations/rulings

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Personal insults do not alter actual FACTS. And the FACTS are that Lane’s killers were equal opportunity, on their way to kill a black youth when they shot Lane. Unlike the Tulsa killers, who specifically targeted blacks.

      • Josh says:

        Dear David Brock, Eric Boehlert, et al,

        While I understand it is their job, you really should make sure that if two of your professional trolls are going to troll the same website, that they use different talking points or move on to others when their favorite points have been shot down in flames.

        Actually I’m pretty sure Numb-skuli and Sam are the same person. I understand the need for this; you professional liberal trolls need to disguise your numbers to make it look like there are more of you. Intimidation and all that. But when the same person just says the same stuff in almost exactly the same way as to make it obvious, well, I’m sorry, that’s just weak. So, either assign an actual second person to troll this blog or make Sam/Numb-skuli use different talking points and stop answering for each other (I mean, really, they couldn’t make it more obvious they’re the same person).

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Personal insults do not alter actual FACTS. And the FACTS are that Lane’s killers were equal opportunity, on their way to kill a black youth when they shot Lane. Unlike the Tulsa killers, who specifically targeted blacks.

      • Josh says:

        Show me a “fact” and I’ll stop insulting you. But you have got nothing.

        And putting the word “FACTS” in all caps doesn’t turn your truth-obscuring suppositions into facts.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Personal insults do not alter actual FACTS. And the FACTS are that Lane’s killers were equal opportunity, on their way to kill a black youth when they shot Lane. Unlike the Tulsa killers, who specifically targeted blacks.

      • Josh says:

        I gotta say Numb-skuli, I’m a little curious. You’re all ready to jump to the defense of the murderous scumbags Luna and James, acting as though they weren’t racist, couldn’t have been racist, yet two things stand out.

        1) You have yet to address their tweets, which I have mentioned in each rebuttal to you. This is because the tweets prove they in fact did hate white people, and for seemingly no reason (Jake England’s father was shot by a black man plus he had just lost his fiance, which may not excuse his using racist language and certainly doesn’t justify murdering black people, but Luna and James had zero motivation other than racial hatred for killing Lane). You act as though their meaningless claim that they were on their way to kill another black person somehow makes their obvious, open racial hatred a non-issue. It. Does. Not.

        2) You fail completely to address any of the other instances Matt listed of clearly racially motivated killing of white people by black murderers. That’s what you liberals do. You focus on tiny, minute details of ONE instance and act as if this completely invalidates our argument. It does not, and shows that you are desperate.

        I’m waiting for you to address the WWII veteran who was beaten to death by black men, the six black teens who beat an Ohio man to death, the gang of blacks who assaulted, stripped and robbed a white tourist in Baltimore, the Minnesota man who was savagely attacked and beaten to the point of brain damage by black men, the 13 year old who was doused with gasoline and set on fire by two blacks in Missouri while the assailants shouted “this is what you get, white boy”, the white guy walking to his car in a parking lot in Memphis when a group of blacks came out of nowhere and shot him dead, the three black teenagers who brutalized a white child on a school bus in Florida while the father of one of the assailants says his son is “sorry,” but that’s “just the way it is.”

        I’m going to assume you side with the racist black thugs who committed all these crimes, or at least want to suggest that none of them were racially motivated.

        Am I suggesting that all black people are violent criminals who hate white people? Not at all. But on the other hand, the killers in the above examples clearly are, and if you reverse the colors involved in any one of them, even the killing of Chris Lane, someone like you would call the murders unquestioningly racially motivated.

        You zero in your focus on just one case, compare it to another that is only similar on the surface, and act as if that somehow proves that nothing Matt spoke of matters. You started off by saying there’s “LOTS of white-on-black crime” but can only name one instance. You, silly troll, are full of it.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          If i I use only subjectively selected anecdotes, i can make anything seem like facts. There’s no dispute that black people sometimes kill white people. Or who’s blacks. Or blacks blacks.. Or whites whites. Etc. And sometimes there are racial motives. But the FACT is that EVERY reputable statistical analysis shows that FAR more people are killed by their own race than visa versa.

      • Josh says:

        Wait, did you seriously post the same thing three or four times? Wow, little troll-man is truly pathetic!

        Keep on using the word FACTS in all caps. I’m sure you’re getting more convincing each time. And by all means, keep avoiding the real issue, which is that while there is much, much more black-on-white shooting and crime in general, the media blows up any instance of white-on-black crime it can find and injects race into it well before any of the facts are known, but ignores most black-on-white crime and refuses to call it racially motivated when they are forced to talk about it.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Repeating truth to lies is the best way to deal with people who try to post neoracist commentary without them being disputed by FACTS.

        • I just want to take the opportunity here for a shout-out to mikhal sklui. A couple of weeks ago you called me a “neoracist,” and I want to thank you for that. I had spent years trying to figure out if I were a paleo-racist, meso-racist or neo-racist. Thanks for straightening me out, sklui. I sleep better o’ nights now. BTW what kind of racist are you?

        • mikhal skuli says:

          I doubt I called any specific individual any names. If I did I apologize. I try to label behavior and note the existence of people who exhibit specific behaviors, not engage in ad hominem personal attacks.

      • Josh says:

        Lol, you typed it in all caps again. I’m soooo persuaded.

        Just how many times can you type the exact same thing before you get tired? Let’s find out.

        By the way, I noticed you have never denied being a Media Matters paid troll.

        Also, I know I’m beating my head against a brick wall here, because MMfA professional trolls will NEVER learn what constitutes a “fact, but I’ll say again “fact” means “something that is objectively true”. It does not mean “something I will repeatedly claim is true despite overwhelming evidence and even proof to the contrary”.

        In other words, continuing to reply to all posts like a stupid, vapid parrot with “insults will not alter FACTS” is getting you nothing but tired fingers and more entertainment for me.

        Finally, I’ve never insulted you. I’ve called you out, and noted that objectively you are a stupid, willfully misinformed, repetitive, unoriginal, pathetic excuse for a human being. And you work for MMfA as a professional troll, have a sock puppet called “Sam” and it’s really funny to see you come back and type the same thing over and over again because you’re desperate and know you’ve lost this argument. Those aren’t insults. Those are just truth.

      • Josh says:

        “Responding to factual inaccuracies by copy/pasting the same FACTS over and over is the best way to deal with those inaccuracies. Better get used to it.”

        Um…no, no it isn’t. Especially when you don’t have any facts. Nothing you’ve said has been factual, and you have very clearly ignored the parts of this story you don’t like and played up the parts you would like us to think support your take on it, when we all know (yes, you know it too) that they don’t. I have soundly defeated every one of your so-called FACTS and have left you spewing drivel. I can just see you huddled over your keyboard, spittle on your chin, quivering as you mutter to yourself “facts, facts, I have the facts, facts, facts…”

        Also, you seem to be operating under the delusion that I’m intimidated by you, and if you keep repeating the same thing I’ll eventually get tired and stop responding, whereupon you can claim to have “won”. I’m not intimidated by you in the least. I find you funny. Stupid, but funny.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Coming on a public forum and self proclaiming yourself the “winner” of a discusion is beyond pathetic. Congratulations ;)

        • mikhal skuli says:

          OK, champ. I’m wondering, though, do you have ‘we are the champions’ playing when you proclaim yourself the “winner” of on-line discussions. Now that really is funny :)

      • Josh says:

        I’m not claiming to have “won”. To “win” there has to be competition. If I were to run over a roadkill, I can’t claim to have “killed” it, because it was already dead, as were your arguments before you even made them.

        I did state, factually, that I defeated your arguments. Perhaps I overstated myself. What I should have said was “held them up to the light so that all can see how stupid they are.”

        But you do make me laugh. So, you can take some solace in that.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          You are supporting overtly racist and neoracist comments and you will forever be on the wrong side of the discussion. Again, congrats on your big “win”. ;)

        • Please delineate the differences between “racist” and “neoracist.” Moreover, do you believe a black person in this country can be “racist?”

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Neoracism – less overt and open than racism but still intended to consistently place a selected minority(ies) in a negative light.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Anyone can have racist attitudes and beliefs. But minorities cannot institutionalize it nor create harm to another group to anywhere near the extent that the majority can to minorities.

        • Therefore, the majority is always evil. This is why multicultural societies don’t work. Or they don’t work well. However, if blacks were the majority and “in power,” that would be great wouldn’t it? Then justice and liberty would prevail throughout the nation. Right?

        • mikhal skuli says:

          I wouldn’t agree with any of the ideas you express in that comment and doubt if you sincerely believe the yourself

      • Josh says:

        “You are supporting overtly racist and neoracist comments and you will forever be on the wrong side of the discussion. Again, congrats on your big “win”.”
        Again, the best way to know that a liberal has no argument is that he starts calling you a racist. Of course, you BEGAN calling Matt a racist, and called me one early in you replies to me, so that pretty much shows you never had an argument to begin with.

        When will you liberals learn that calling us racists isn’t intimidating anymore?

        And, speaking as someone who thinks you’re a morally reprehensible idiot without a shred of decency or honor, I automatically call any side with people like you on it “the wrong side”.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Wrong again. I didn’t call you are racist. I talk about behaviors and attitudes, not people.

      • Fred says:

        Mikhal,

        Popped back in here to see what’s going on. You really are a liberal punching bag aren’t you? I have to hand it to you…….., your stamina is impressive. But seriously, you really don’t amount to much more than an irritant as far as I can see. It’s like, “How much can I get under their skin, without putting in any effort on my part.”

        Don’t you get bored? You’re boring me.

    • Gair says:

      The points made by the article’s writer are good but what he is missing is that 12% of the U.S. population is black and, of late, a disproportionate number of crimes, especially assaults against whites, are comitted by blacks, particularly younger blacks. You don’t see that amongst hispanics, latinos mexicans and asians.

      The author missed one very important case and that is of a white man beaten by 4-6 black men in the lily-white city of Oshkosh, WI (97% white). The culprits have not been found. When black -on-white crime starts ocurring in cities which are almost entirely white andc where the culture is white, the negroids better get out fast. If I was a black male, I would not want to live in a city of 75,000 which is 97% black, especially where one or more of my own culture, has comitted a heinous crime. Fortunately, this young white man survived and will not be permanently disabled; but, if something like this happens again in that city of 97% white, every black citizen is in danger. It’s like a white man going to the south side of Chicago and beating a black man….he is ‘dead meat.’

      • Gair says:

        I meant to blog ….’97% white…’ (not black)

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Crime is a socioeconomic issue. …….. unless you believe some races are more predisposed to crime (and we all know what that means).Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime b/c blacks are disproportionately poor. They commit crimes against whites b/c they have a disproportionate amount of the $ and goods criminals want.

      • mikhal skuli says:

        Anecdotes about isolated incidents do not trump actual FACTS.

      • Josh says:

        Keep typing FACTS in all caps, little paid troll. You’re changing soooo many minds.

        The problem with liberals claiming to have “facts”, is that they have no idea what the word “fact” even means.

      • Josh says:

        Let’s say you’re right, and crime is caused by poverty (which it isn’t, but let’s just go with that for now). More blacks aren’t poor because of “conservative white racism”, even though that’s what you actual racists on the left would love us to believe. The reason is that they are continually blasted with the message that the deck is stacked against them and they will never succeed without help from Demonrats…sorry, Democraps…sorry, Demonic evil people. There, that’s better. They are told to not even try, because self-made success is tantamount to “acting white” and being an “Uncle Tom”. Instead, vote Demonic Evil Party of Old White KKK Members because they “really care” and will help you…by creating low-income “urban housing” projects for you to live in and turn into war zones. Meanwhile they encourage “gangsta” culture and promote violence and crime as a way of life. And they lay all the blame on “whitey” and encourage these young black men to grow up violent, murderous and full of hatred for white people.

        Urban ghetto culture will always be violent and hate-filled, causing the disproportionate number of crimes committed by blacks, unless and until the rap culture and media stop glamorizing it and felons like Al Sharpton are recognized for the pariahs they are.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          All of that is factuslly inaccurate. EVERY valid study of crime shows that it is disproportionately higher among poorer populations. You can argue the premise that Blacks are poor b/c “white liberals” encourage that, but your aguement totally ignores the FACT that, unlike ANY OTHER RACE IN US, Blacks spent over 80% of their time in US as slaves or subject to Jim Crow institutionalized racial discrimination.

        • There are too many variables to say dogmatically that poverty drives black crime in this country, although as a Marxist, you adhere to that narrative because your religion says it does. It is also a fact that criminals have a lower IQ than average, but I’m sure you’re not going to say that blacks generally have a lower IQ than the general population. Statistics are a double-edged sword my friend, so let’s be careful before you unsheathe the scabbard. Better stick to your narratives than try to fool with facts.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Calling me a commie doesn’t change FACTS. And EVERY valid study of crime shows that it is disproportionately higher among poorer populations.

      • Josh says:

        “All of that is factuslly inaccurate.”

        Numb-skuli is so stupid that not only doesn’t he know what a “fact” is, he also doesn’t know how to spell “factually.”

        By the way, Numb-skuli, considering that in your little world, a FACT is whatever you hope you can make people believe, I’ll take your criticism of my innaccuracy with an entire shaker of salt.

        “EVERY valid study of crime shows”

        You said it yourself. Every VALID study. When a liberal qualifies studies like that, what they mean is “Every study I decided I liked the results of, while ignoring the ones I don’t.”

        “…unlike ANY OTHER RACE IN US, Blacks spent over 80% of their time in US as slaves or subject to Jim Crow institutionalized racial discrimination”

        HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Sorry, I don’t follow the liberal narrative. I deal in the real world, buddy, and the real world says that EVERY race has spent time in slavery. The Jews’ time in slavery makes black slavery look like a drop in the bucket. Besides, not a single living black person today has spent one second in slavery, yet they never stop talking about it. You’d think slavery just ended a few years ago. But sorry, you don’t get to blame slavery on the fact that the herd mentality that has been forced on blacks today is the fault of liberals. This shouldn’t be any real surprise. After all, the Democratic Party is the party of slavery, the KKK and Jim Crow, and today they are the party of the soft bigotry of low expectations and fostering more racial hatred.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          As always, personal insults and grammer/spelling policing (the last bastions of the uninformed) do not alter actual FACTS.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          As always, personal insults and grammer/spelling policing (the last bastions of the uninformed) do not change the TRUTH.

  2. fukakike says:

    It’s the jews who are dividing blacks and whites while they run away with all the money they made from usury and the death of our sons and daughters in wars for Israel.

    If you won’t addres that, than YOU are a COWARD. It’s as easy as 123 buddy.

  3. fukakike says:

    Who owns the media? Federal reserve? Who controls are foreign war policy? Who sets much of the curriculum from elementary through “higher” education.

    I’ll tell you the ashkeNAZIS aka the jews. All jews must be exterminated for us to live in peace.

    The jews monopolized the trans-atlantic slave trade then blamed whites to sick the venomous blacks on them.

    Look it up, and remember, if you’re not telling the truth about jews and their divide and conquer strategy, you are a coward.

    Syria and Iran are White nations with White leaders, and guess who wants them dead because they are against Israel.

    They know, that whites who aren’t blinded from being dumbed down in american society and miseducated through media propaganda and “higher” education, have a keen intuition which realized why jews always change their names and why they own every single central bank. They are the oppressors and they are hiding and blaming white people for their actions.

  4. CodyBankson says:

    So as a white-American what can we do about it? Its too late to put them on a boat back to Africa where they can be African-Africans and live in ‘peace’ (highest murder rate in the world) like all the other African countries. Also what would the US’s crime rates look like if we subtracted crimes committed by blacks ? Do white people need to start shooting black infants, killing black war heroes, and raping black women to retaliate? Lets face it the black ‘Community’ can’t control the ‘Community’, so who will?

  5. pam32 says:

    White Victim of Black Crime

    http://able2know.org/topic/138570-1

  6. James says:

    Law enforcement absolutely needs to charge the defendants in black on white crimes with hate crimes to serve as a deterrent. Many of these cases have included the black person addressing the white persons race before, during and/or after the attacks. That is the definition of a race-based crime. If a white person assaults a black person and uses a racial slur while doing so, it should be a hate crime as well.

  7. Sam says:

    @crispenrobles
    “Please delineate the differences between “racist” and “neoracist.” Moreover, do you believe a black person in this country can be “racist?”
    Since we have seemed to have moved on from the name calling I will chime in:
    A neoracist is one who often holds the same opinions and attitudes about others as racists but hides such beliefs in a smokescreen designed to defeat any “PC censors” by using code words or vague references that allow the neoracist to claim innocence when called out. Outright disdain/ hating of minorities is shunned in favor of language that champions “white rights” or the belief that whites are the new “oppressed.” Jihads are waged against “lazy” people, “special privileges, perceived “injustices” or “racial agitators” while initial problems that cause such conditions are ignored. While racism is by and far looked down upon, neoracists enjoy wide support on Fox “News” and other conservative media outlets because neoracists have learned that calling someone a disparaging word is not kosher…however striking a cord of outrage (no matter how biased, unjust, or wrong) can garner support. Matt Walsh’s blog stands as tangible proof that such a tactic works. Ignorance is a key component of neoracism.
    Racism is prejudice plus power. It is the ability to deprive a group of people socially, politically, and economically based on the feeling held against them. Therefore only the person in the position of power can practice racism. Black people can be just a prejudiced and bigoted as white people but they cannot be racist in this country. Bigotry and racism are two separate things. Calling someone a mean name is not racist (and sadly many people jump to the “r” word well before it is warranted). Racism comes into play when power is used to deprive another who is not in an equal position…the same thing happens in regards to gender (that is why women cannot be sexist) because traditionally men have held and still hold on to power.

    • (1) Therefore, you would consider three black guys who use racial epithets, yell “Get whitey,” and jump and beat unconscious one white guy, without anyone else being present, and without any provocation other than the “victim’s” skin pigmentation, an example of prejudice, but certainly not of racism. Although they outnumber the white guy (and Lord knows he deserves what he gets), they still do not exercise political power over him. If the roles are reversed, then it’s racism. (2) Blacks can never be guilty of committing a hate crime. Isn’t that true? (3) Can black Africans in Ivory Coast be racist, since blacks hold political power in that country? I’m betting somehow even blacks in Ivory Coast, or anywhere else for that matter, cannot ever, no never ever be considered racist at any time due to colonialism, neocolonialism or some-such other race crime. (4) Do you believe race theory will likely divide races further, or will it unite them? Does race theory promote racial harmony? (5) Can a Chinese male who despises blacks and keys their vehicles only because he knows the owners of said vehicles are black be considered racist? His tribal group doesn’t hold political power in this country, but I’m betting that whites are somehow responsible for his racism. (6) Do you believe the world would be a better place today had Caucasian people never existed? Yes or no? (7) If you found yourself alone at an ATM and you were robbed at gunpoint by a black male, would you report it to the police? (8) Your home is broken into by two or more armed black males. They want money and anything else of value and threaten to kill your family members (I doubt that you’re married, so we’ll say your parents or siblings) and then kill you, would you try to defend said family members and/or yourself in any manner whatsoever? Would you not feel relieved at last that the guilt for all the crimes your race has committed against the race of the perpetrators is about to be lifted from your shoulders? Or even if you don’t feel guilt personally, probably because you have lived a life of impeccable moral rectitude, giving you the power to judge entire blocks of humanity based on skin color, would you not accept the deaths of you and your family as part of the dues you must pay for being born white? And if you somehow survived, and the police asked for a description of the gunmen, would you not tell them you don’t remember, or tell them that they were white, since blacks were slaves and the victims of Jim Crow everywhere in the United States until only fifty years ago?

      • mikhal skuli says:

        IF there was ANY evidence that Lane was targeted b/c he was white calling this a racially motivated killing would be accurate. As it is, perps said it wasn’t, police said it wasn’t and they were arrested going to kill a black guy. But even if it was, this one headline making killing (or any of the others) does not support anything in the blog.

      • Sam says:

        (1) Therefore, you would consider three black guys who use racial epithets, yell “Get whitey,” and jump and beat unconscious one white guy, without anyone else being present, and without any provocation other than the “victim’s” skin pigmentation, an example of prejudice, but certainly not of racism. Although they outnumber the white guy (and Lord knows he deserves what he gets), they still do not exercise political power over him. If the roles are reversed, then it’s racism.
        Umm no…racism is institutional. It is an ingrained element that has an undercurrent of keeping one (or more) group(s) disenfranchised through economic, social, and political inequality. As I said racism is not calling people “mean names” but if that is how you wish to look at it then this blog and the people that have commented on it in the affirmative…are racists…that is by YOUR definition (attacking someone…even verbally, with no provocation other than a person’s skin pigmentation and biased uninformed notions about what is “wrong” with their community).
        (2) Blacks can never be guilty of committing a hate crime. Isn’t that true?
        If you have factual credible and historical proof regarding any Black “hate crime” that stymied white attempts for equal voting rights, civil rights, political/social equality, better housing or anything of the sort please share…
        (3) Can black Africans in Ivory Coast be racist, since blacks hold political power in that country? I’m betting somehow even blacks in Ivory Coast, or anywhere else for that matter, cannot ever, no never ever be considered racist at any time due to colonialism, neocolonialism or some-such other race crime.
        Your initial question was regarding Blacks here in America…just because you don’t like my answer does not open the door to pull in other areas. But to be fair to your question and to show that despite the location there is a constant, in factual history whenever colonial powers set up shop in a country (India, Australia, South Africa, The Middle East, various African countries, Afghanistan) they wrested the reigns of control from the native people and took a position of power and oppression. They also happened to be factually European (READ: white). So could Blacks in the Ivory Coast be racist is they were in power and sought to deprive others…sure…human nature is wicked all around; but historical evidence shows that white people have traditionally been in the position most often labeled racist.
        (4) Do you believe race theory will likely divide races further, or will it unite them? Does race theory promote racial harmony?
        I am of the mindset that the concept of races was something put into place to justify the status/treatment of different peoples (the same thing happened with gender). As a Christian I know we are all descended from one man and thus we are all related. Our features are adaptations to our environments but beyond that we are the same. I believe when people treat other people like they want to be treated than there will be harmony.
        (5) Can a Chinese male who despises blacks and keys their vehicles only because he knows the owners of said vehicles are black be considered racist? His tribal group doesn’t hold political power in this country, but I’m betting that whites are somehow responsible for his racism.
        Like I have said before…being racist is more than calling someone a mean name or keying their car. Everyone can be bigoted, hateful, spiteful, or whatever awful thing that people do to each other. The Chinese man’s actions are shameful but they do not deprive anyone of any social, economic, or political equality.
        (6) Do you believe the world would be a better place today had Caucasian people never existed? Yes or no?
        Lol…no everyone is here for a reason…the world would be a better place if everyone treated each other like they wanted to be treated.
        (7) If you found yourself alone at an ATM and you were robbed at gunpoint by a black male, would you report it to the police?
        SMH…naturally yes…I would also break the “stop snitchin” rule and point the guy out in a line up/court room.
        (8) Your home is broken into by two or more armed black males. They want money and anything else of value and threaten to kill your family members (I doubt that you’re married, so we’ll say your parents or siblings) and then kill you, would you try to defend said family members and/or yourself in any manner whatsoever?
        This makes no sense…it seems you believe that I am white and not married (and you are wrong on both counts). Do you fantasize about such scenarios?? I mean I don’t spend my days thinking about the equally probable aspect of two or more armed white men breaking into my house because they want my money and/or anything else and what I would do. That is a sad way to live life. If anyone broke into my home I would defend my loved ones no matter who they were or what color they were…I think anyone would do the same.
        Would you not feel relieved at last that the guilt for all the crimes your race has committed against the race of the perpetrators is about to be lifted from your shoulders?
        SMH, and we step into neoracist territory. If you think black people sit around and plot of ways to “get back at whitey for years of oppression, slavery, Jim Crow, the Middle Passage, killing MLK and Malcolm X, looking too deep into welfare, and not letting us have all the white women we want” then there is clearly a problem with how you spend your free time and the illumination as to why Matt Walsh resonates with you becomes clear.
        Or even if you don’t feel guilt personally, probably because you have lived a life of impeccable moral rectitude, giving you the power to judge entire blocks of humanity based on skin color, would you not accept the deaths of you and your family as part of the dues you must pay for being born white? And if you somehow survived, and the police asked for a description of the gunmen, would you not tell them you don’t remember, or tell them that they were white, since blacks were slaves and the victims of Jim Crow everywhere in the United States until only fifty years ago?
        Since I was not born white I guess that is a “dilemma” I don’t have to worry about.

      • Josh says:

        “IF there was ANY evidence that Lane was targeted b/c he was white calling this a racially motivated killing would be accurate.”
        There is, moron. The tweets. The tweets. THE TWEETS. Apparently you think writing in all caps makes something true, so hopefully when I put something true in all caps you’ll notice it. Lane’s killers were racists, and since I am a conservative, I do not use the term “racist” to mean “person who is winning an argument against me”. I mean someone who judges others by the color of their skin first. That is what a racist is. Sam is a racist. YOU are a racist.

        Two racist black thugs killed a white man for being white. They tweeted about enjoying “knocking” white people, and they “knocked” one that very day. That’s a hate-crime, pure and simple.

        “As it is, perps said it wasn’t, police said it wasn’t…”
        Riiiiiight, because two murderous thugs would NEVER lie.

        “…and they were arrested going to kill a black guy.”
        Irrelevant. KKK members killed white men for being black sympathizers or for getting in their way politically. The mere fact that they were willing to kill another black person doesn’t make them any less racist. I will keep saying that until you realize that your argument is crap and always has been crap or you simply stop posting.

        “But even if it was, this one headline making killing (or any of the others) does not support anything in the blog.”
        Again, you ignore every other instance Matt named. The other instances were CLEARLY racially motivated. Well, the Chris Lane killing was, too, but the others even you can’t say were not. Sorry, you remain as wrong as you ever have been.

        Oh, but wait, you’re about to tell me that personal insults do not alter FACTS, aren’t you? Ouch, I’m stung. It hurts so much being told the same thing over and over like a broken record! However will I recover?

        • mikhal skuli says:

          No one said one or more of Lanes killers could have been racists. That doesn’t make the killing a racial killing. The tweets said absolutely NOTHING about Lane. They said NOTHING about going out and killing whites. Only ONE OF THREE perps made the tweets. When arrested they were on their way to KILL A BLACK GUY! They said they did it b/c they are bored, not b/c Lane was white – if killing whites was so important to them as you say WHY WOULD THEY LIE.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Crime stats PROVE that almost all crime is intraracial. So no matter how many isolated headline making anecdotes you cite your conclusions will continue to be WRONG!

  8. Josh says:

    Well, I gotta say, I may be wrong about Sam being Numb-skuli. I mean, yes, they’re both paid trolls, but Sam is a whole new level of stupid. I mean, I just don’t know where to start. So much wrongness in such a short time. I just can’t dumb myself down that much. You know, I knew liberals treated racism as if it was institutional and solely the property of white people, but I never saw someone actually put that in writing. If you truly believe that, there is no discussion to be had because you have sold your brain in exchange for marching slogans.

    • Sam says:

      The ultimate credibility for my platform is that you disagree with it. That pointed fact…based on the positions you have advocated in your posts cements the validity of what a small minority is saying here. If there was an “doubt” about the truth of what I have said…you have just validated it.

  9. Sam says:

    @Josh

    “Riiiiiight, because two murderous thugs would NEVER lie”
    As it was already pointed out…if their hatred of whites was so overpowering they would have gleefully confirmed such beliefs and being so young would probably pointed to some influence/manifesto that explored their thought processes. The murdeerrs were not the only ones who noted the killing were not based on race. Police investigators: the people trained to review crime scenes, interview the suspects and close acquaintances, and pore over evidence; also came to the same conclusion based on the gathered materials of the crime. As I have said before: if you, Matt, or anyone else who believes different has some additional information (and the credentials that show you are able to analyze and interpret evidence ) ,have done your own thorough investigation and have the evidence to back up your statements….please present it to the rest of us.

    • White-Native-American Pride says:

      “Police investigators: the people trained to review crime scenes, interview the suspects and close acquaintances, and pore over evidence; also came to the same conclusion based on the gathered materials of the crime.”

      Are these the same ones that wrongfully send all these blacks to prison?

  10. Brian says:

    Lol I’m kinda impressed with your stories…but you should know that those black guys you are writing about have not killed only white people you’ll find that 90% of the people they’ve killed or robbed are black people….so just don’t make it as if white people are always the target for black people who do crime….and another thing that surprises me,you don’t write about those white people who murder black,I wonder why?????

    • The point of this essay concerns the way media reports certain types of crime. In light of that, your comments are completely irrelevant. What has happened in this country that people can’t read? Video games? Drugs? Cell phones? TV? Poor schooling? Lack of discipline? If you read an article on the decline of the wolf population in Montana, would you say, “I’m surprised you didn’t talk about wolves attacking humans. Don’t make it sound like wolves are the only animals in Montana.” Sorry to say but you can’t read.

      • Josh says:

        The problem can be summed up in one word, Crispin: liberalism.

      • mikhal skuli says:

        Understanding what is written and being able to see thru the false premises, leaps of logic and neoracist motives are two different things. You clearly lack the latter.

      • White-Native-American Pride says:

        Reverse Racism always cracks me up when I see some one write it. Does that mean that whites are the reverse minority and blacks are the reverse majority?

        “The VAST majority of killings by all races in US are not racially motivated.” I do agree with this point however you couldn’t tell by the mainstream media and your lack of attacking them and vehemently attacking bloggers instead.

  11. MadHatter says:

    I think you’re putting too much emphasis on race here – Maybe the first person you were talking about was a racist even if he was black. *Gasp!* The other people in your argument it’s not so clear. You’re forgetting aggravating factors such as poverty as well.. You’re being angry and taking a few good examples to make wide sweeping generalizations, not to mention looking like a racist yourself. (70% of black fathers abandon their kids? Good luck finding a credible source for that.)

    • Where have you been? It doesn’t take any luck to find a credible source. How can you be living on this planet and not know? I say this because you come off sounding like some kind of expert on the black family, which you are obviously not.

      “According to government statistics, 72 percent of African-American children are born to unmarried mothers.”

      http://www.theroot.com/buzz/72-percent-african-american-children-born-unwed-mothers

    • mikhal skuli says:

      Like many bigots they take a valid stat and then make a leap of logic to a racist conclusion. 70% of black children live in single parent homes. That is a valid stat. But it does not mean that 70% of fathers “abandon” their kids (unless you consider divorce, separation, death, incarceration, etc to be “abandonment”).

      • We’re talking about right-now in the present, not the antebellum South. We’re talking about 2013, not the Jim Crow South or apartheid South Africa. No one is denying that blacks commit far more crimes than other groups in the demographic map of the US. However, as per usual, you believe that blacks are thrown into prison arbitrarily because of their race. Watch some episodes of “The First 48.” Look at the races of the perps, the crimes they commit, and see whether the cops are framing blacks and the juries convicting them because of their melanistic skin and the judges ignoring it all. But that program deals in facts that go against your fantastical narrative for blacks, so forget it. I know. Why don’t you ask a nice policeman, whose beat is in the hood, if you can go for a ride-along some night. No, forget that, too. You’re an ideologue, to whom the truth is like kryptonite to Superman. The fact that black kids grow up without fathers in the home creates a vicious cycle, as those kids repeat the behavior they’ve learned in their fatherless homes. To a kid, any reason for the absence of a parent is abandonment. Even death is a kind of abandonment, to a kid. And of course there are underlying causes. No one said there weren’t, but as per usual, you construct a straw man so you can set him aflame. What’s ironic is that the person calling everyone racists (i.e., you) is the real racist. You infantilize blacks ostensibly because of slavery and Jim Crow. While other groups who have suffered in the recent past (Jews, Japanese, Chinese to name a few) get on with life, you excuse the pathological behavior that keeps blacks from achieving on the same level as whites, et al. You see blacks as children who need the likes of you to defend them. Yes, you’re quite the hero. You have certain expectations of people. Everyone does. But your expectations of blacks are way low. You don’t treat them equally because you don’t see them as your equal. Yes, you love it that blacks live and move and have their being on the liberal plantation, where the white man can take care of his burden, or since you’re not white, where “compassionate” Marxists like you can care for the poor victims of an evil past. The only question I’m left with concerns motive. What motivates crypto-racists like you?

        • mikhal skuli says:

          YOUR OWN SOURCE that you misuse to get to your bigoted conclusions said slavery, segregation and disproportionate incarceration rates lead to blacks having higher rates of single parent families. YOUR SOURCES, not mine.

        • Y que? I cited it for the stats, not the MSM commentary.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Ha! That’s precious. It doesn’t work that way. It’s YOUR source and you are stuck with it. ALL of it, not just what you like.  

        • It does work that way. Better check Roberts Rules of Web Posting Etiquette. Try to keep up, skuli.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          YOUR own sources disagree with you. That’s hilarious.

        • Don’t make a big deal out of nothing. They agree with me on the statistics. That’s why I cited it.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          They seem to know something you don’t. That when one specific minority group of people in a society spent 85% of their time in slavery or under institutionalized jim Crow discrimination and now have much worse outcomes on every measure of social/health/economic well-being (including single parent families) there’s a reason.

        • There is a reason, but that’s not it. How does it feel to be an embarrassment to black people? Like water off a duck’s back no doubt. Cryptoracists like you don’t care about black people because they are motivated by hatred of whites.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          ALL of the actually FACTS are against you, cr. Just tell the truth and admit that you believe blacks are inferior and we can move on.

    • mikhal skuli says:

      btw-the very article that is being used to support the 70% figure also lists the underlying causes for high rates of children in single parent homes-slavery, segregation, disproportionate incarceration rates. In short, factors that those who spout neoracist propoganda have specifically denied in these comments.

  12. Andre Brigham says:

    Skuli, you make me embarrassed to be black.

    • Skuli is a cryptoracist who believes blacks can’t make it on their own due to slavery and Jim Crow. Therefore, he isn’t motivated out of concern or compassion for blacks. He couldn’t care less about them. He’s motivated by hatred for white people.

      • mikhal skuli says:

        The main thing I believe in terms of this discussion is that when one specific minority group of people in a society spent 85% of their time in slavery or under institutionalized jim Crow discrimination and now have much worse outcomes on every measure of social/health/economic well-being there is a correlation. Knida’ hard to figure how or why anyone would even try to deny that.

    • mikhal skuli says:

      Hope your self esteem improves. btw-don’t give the power of how you feel to others and you won’t have those problems

    • White-Native-American Pride says:

      Don’t let others mockery define your character, be proud of who you are as a individual. Also, no need to be embarrassed of his actions for intelligent non-blacks know better then to judge one by others actions. And those that don’t are to wrapped up in their bigotry.

  13. Carrie says:

    the truth should never ever be sacrificed on the altar of pc this isn’t a sustainable practice for the fat stinky elephant in the room can only be ignored and or excused for so long. The pc bubble will collapse.

  14. Portia says:

    Blacks aren’t a minority thanks to breeding like flies for the last 5 decades. Thanks to the female of the species having multiple male sexual partners the ever growing biomass of the species exhibits genetic diversity. One female can mate with several males in a given week and rarely do they know which male is the parent of a particular offspring.

    • babs says:

      crispinrobles
      GO! And where I come from (New Zealand Maori) i just wish more of my great pakeha mates stand up for themselves like you! Ka mate!

  15. George Sullivan says:

    You ‘d probably think that if a black or Hispanic person is insulted by a white person and the black or hispanic person decides to assualt the white person, they have just committed a Hate Crime? That’s a load of Horseshit!! Tell me if I’m right or wrong

  16. bluesock says:

    Great blog! Though I would like to see some valid sources for the stories and statistics mentioned (from both the blogger and the commentators).

  17. humblist says:

    Plain speak. BLACKS ARE RACIST TO THE EXTREME…ALWAYS…ALWAYS…DONT PLAY THE FOOL….ITS WAR ON WHITES 2.0. WITH A PSYCHOPATH IN THE WHITE HOUSE

  18. Stevens says:

    I agree with you that these scenarios you listed are hate crimes. However even if these are not seen as hate crimes these people will go to jail. White people get away with committing hate crimes more than black people do. Yes both races commit hate crimes but black people almost never get away with it.

    • White-Native-American Pride says:

      Interesting statement, you got any studies to back it up? Also, it might be a good idea to remove variables like class of the accused. One might be surprised at the conviction rate of lower class whites accused of crimes. I will submit the upper class damn near gets away with open murder and that the middle class at least gets a fair trial.

  19. gene willis says:

    whites get away with hate crimes,where did you come from? stevens.who past the hate crime law that protects minorities only,whites in goverment and signed into law by the race hustling president.and only if any,blacks may be charged with a hate crime maybe 1% will be charged.if not the racist doj will drop all othere charges stevens,but the doj will go for blood if anything not black is’nt chared and convicted for hate crimes against blacks.now you can burry you’r head in the black sands.

  20. gene willis says:

    hey,skuli,i take it you are either a hate monger or a person who believes in white extermination of a nation.you play the victim hood for those who would gladely maim and kill just like the whites did 60 years ago for minority purity of race.what anyone person would try to convey,you remain addiment to hitlers distroy that which is white.which you replace the word jew.so,in you’r infintile ways,you denounce any body that you see as a threat to you’r minority stature.pity,the jewish owned media works just like you do.take oneside of an issue,mix and stir,never shake.pour onto stupid people and vowalla,whites are to blame.

  21. gene willis says:

    hey skuli,did you review the stats on how many blacks were on welfare from 1920 to 1978.and why the black families have the fewest fathers on record.and how about arrests,did you figure out why the prisons have more blacks incorcerated then any othere group.did you figure out who has done more harm to this nation then any othere group for the past 90 years with their rioting and killings and hanous crimes not mention on the jewish owned net works.the only differance to racial hate crimes is,the politians and the people like eric holder and obama have sanction the killing of white people.are you saying that you will justify these crimes committed by blacks/ and i am not talking about the police,that is somthing people like you use when you are losing an argument.

    • mikhal skuli says:

      Yes, I’ve seen all the stats about how blacks do worse on virtually every socio-economic indicator in US. Those who do not subscribe to the belief that blacks are inherently inferior to whites know that this is due to the fact that blacks were enslaved and lived under Jim Crow for 250 of their 300 years in US.

      • White-Native-American Pride says:

        Just a curious question, do you believe whites are inherently inferior to blacks in anyway? Also, what is your take on the DOJ employee running the Black Supremacist website?

      • White-Native-American Pride says:

        Have you seen these FBI stats?

        An analysis of ‘single offender victimization figures’ from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white — with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          Your making me laugh. Quoting from pat buchanons ridiculous racist book is a joke. Here’s what bureau of justice says about it. The figures cited by Buchanan “are not reliable as exact point estimates of the actual levels of such crime.” In other words, pat buchanan is lying.

        • @mikhal skuli
          You like to throw that word “racist” around quite a bit. In case you don’t know, racism didn’t even make the Ten Commandments (God’s a racist, right?), so if you think you’re better than those whom you accuse, rate your words and actions against the Decalogue and see how squeaky clean you come out. You’re no better than the people you call “racist,” chum. In fact, you might even be worse. Get over yourself, Pharisee.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          I don’t throw it around. I very carefully apply it to statements that are in fact racist. Buchanan’s book is filled with racist statements.

        • mikhal skuli says:

          btw-buchanan specifically lied about the “statistics” he used to get to his racist conclusions. They weren’t from the fbi. They weren’t actual crime statistics. They weren’t even based on a valid scientific study. They came from bureau of justice victim interviews, the sample size of which met NO scientific standards. That is why the boj specifically repudiated buchanan’s use of their information.

  22. White-Native-American Pride says:

    @mikhal Skuli or any other spirited lad who wants to reply
    1.) Do you think Hitler wasn’t anti-Semitic because he also put non-Jews in concentration camps?
    2.) Do you think the KKK weren’t racist because of their documented cases of attacks on non-blacks?
    3.) Do you believe Jerry Sandusky was not a pedophile because he also had sexual relations with his wife?
    4.) Do you vehemently attack mainstream media for not talking about black on white crimes when they talk about white on black crimes?
    5.) Do you protest sites and post for not discussing black on black crime?
    6.) Do you protest the feminist movement for ignoring the blatant discrimination of darker skinned black females?
    7.) Do you write Sharpton, Jackson, Oprah, and other blacks who has positioned themselves as black leaders for also not talking about the problems facing non-blacks?
    8.) Are you agenda driving by not mentioning cases of black on white crimes?
    9.) Do you believe all discrimination faced by a black person is racism? If so what about the non-blacks who faced the same discrimination at the same place? Is it too farfetched to believe that a black can face discrimination not because of race but because of class? (IE Upper, lower, and middle class) Have you ever thought maybe that upsets some non-blacks who face the same discrimination to also be blamed for the problem?
    10.) Do you not think it is insulting to poor and lower class whites when you perpetrate white equals money, power, and privileged?
    11.) Do you think of yourself as a racist when you seem to imply there are no whites struggling in poverty and dealing with discrimination?
    12.) Do you think the worse victims of Whites in America are the Native Americans or do they not matter?
    13.) Do you equally blame all the people involved in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, including the Arabs and war tribes of Africa?
    14.) Do you know the main city where African slaves were bartered for existed long before the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and the arrival of the European?
    15.) Do you believe Colonialism destroyed Africans’ lives and if so why do you help to continue the same thing here to Native Americans?
    16.) Do you know why they were going to kill the black Pastor’s son?
    17.) Do you know what a yeoman is?
    18.) Do you know how many whites actually owned slaves in America?
    19.) Do you protest the constant negative stereo-types of rural Southerners and other country people by mainstream entertainment?
    20.) Do you they are many blacks who actually live the same or similar lifestyles that is being mocked?

  23. CarlB says:

    Matt is 100% right! I worked beside a 40+ married black male who could not go a day without bringing up race and it was always pro black, anti-white. The sad thing was that he passed on his racist views to his kids who will now carry on his racial hatred of whites. The black community has shit on MLK’s dream of a society where we all live together as one. You can thank Sharpton, Jackson and every major city usually has a head black activist to rant and rave about the wrongs committed by whites against blacks. Whites need to organize and stand up to these thugs and demand the same justice, entitlements and preferences that blacks demand.

    • mikhal skuli says:

      This comment is one of the best examples of how racism and all forms of bigotry work. Take one person (or any numerically unrepresentative group of people) who have negative traits and then stereotype their entire race as having those traits. Obviously there are black racists. That is a long way from there being a black war against whites.

  24. MARK TRAINA says:

    NAAWP MANDALA NEWS: What are WHITE PEOPLE saying!
    http://www.theburningplatform.com/2012/07/13/naawp/feed/

    NAAWP MEDIA BOYCOTTS: MSNBC, CNN, HLN, CNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, HUFFINGTO POST, WASHINGTON POST, NEW YORK and LOS ANGELES TIMES!

    NAAWP MEDIA BOYCOTTS: NEW ORLEANS, LOS ANGELES, BOSTON, CLEVELAND, PHILLY, BATON ROUGE, SHREVEPORT, JACKSON, MEMPHIS, OAKLAND, WATTS, COONCARGO, BALTIMORE, PITTSBURG, ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM, MONGOMERY, LOUISVILLE, WASHINGTON D.C., HOUSTON and every other PREDOMINATELY BLACK BLIGHTED CITY and TOWN in AMERICA!

    WARNING: WHITE PEOPLE should stay out of the afore mentioned CITIES and TOWNS cause those BLACK DUDES will KILL YA for POCKET CHANGE or simply for TARGET PRACTICE!

    fatuous1
    MARK TRAINA
    fatuouscra@aol.com
    http://www.marktraina.webs.com
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
    mark a. traina/certified school psychologist/civil rights activist/504-231-3056
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE

    PS: Anyone who has a PROBLEM with this BLOG can KISS my LILY WHITE AZZ!

Comments are closed.